Unveiling The Screenwriter Behind Breakfast At Tiffany's Iconic Script

who wrote the script for breakfast at tiffany

The iconic film *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* (1961), based on Truman Capote’s 1958 novella of the same name, had its screenplay written by George Axelrod. Axelrod, a renowned playwright and screenwriter, adapted Capote’s story for the screen, infusing it with wit and charm while making significant changes to the narrative, particularly in the portrayal of the protagonist, Holly Golightly. Despite some deviations from the source material, Axelrod’s script, combined with Audrey Hepburn’s unforgettable performance, cemented the film as a timeless classic in Hollywood history.

Characteristics Values
Name George Axelrod
Birth Date June 9, 1922
Death Date June 21, 2003
Nationality American
Occupation Screenwriter, Playwright, Director
Notable Works The Seven Year Itch (play and screenplay), Breakfast at Tiffany's (screenplay), The Manchurian Candidate (screenplay)
Adaptation Adapted Truman Capote's novella "Breakfast at Tiffany's" for the 1961 film
Collaboration Worked closely with director Blake Edwards on the film adaptation
Changes from Novella Made significant changes to the story, including altering the ending and toning down the character of Holly Golightly
Legacy Known for his witty dialogue and sophisticated comedies, Axelrod's screenplay for Breakfast at Tiffany's remains a classic in American cinema
Awards Nominated for a Writers Guild of America Award for Best Written American Comedy for Breakfast at Tiffany's

anmeal

Original Novel Author: Truman Capote wrote the novella Breakfast at Tiffany's in 1958

Truman Capote, the original author of the novella *Breakfast at Tiffany’s*, penned this iconic work in 1958. Published in *Esquire* magazine, the novella introduced readers to the enigmatic character of Holly Golightly, a young woman navigating life in 1940s New York City. Capote’s writing style, characterized by its sharp wit, vivid imagery, and emotional depth, brought Holly to life as a complex and captivating figure. Her charm, vulnerability, and restless spirit resonated deeply with audiences, making the novella an instant classic. Capote’s ability to capture the essence of post-war New York and the human condition cemented his place as a literary master.

While Truman Capote wrote the original novella, it is essential to distinguish between the author of the source material and the screenwriter responsible for adapting it into the 1961 film. The script for *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* was written by George Axelrod, who collaborated closely with director Blake Edwards. Axelrod’s challenge was to translate Capote’s nuanced narrative into a cinematic experience while maintaining the spirit of the original work. Although the film took creative liberties, such as altering Holly’s character and introducing a more conventional romantic ending, it remains a beloved adaptation that introduced Holly Golightly to a global audience.

Capote’s novella provided the foundation for Axelrod’s script, but the two works differ significantly in tone and structure. The novella is more introspective and ambiguous, exploring themes of identity, loneliness, and the search for belonging. Capote’s prose delves into Holly’s inner life, offering a raw and unfiltered portrayal of her struggles. In contrast, the film softens some of Holly’s edges, emphasizing her charm and glamour while downplaying the darker aspects of her character. Despite these differences, both the novella and the film owe their enduring appeal to Capote’s original creation.

Truman Capote’s involvement with the film adaptation was minimal, and he was reportedly dissatisfied with the changes made to his story. Capote had envisioned Marilyn Monroe in the role of Holly Golightly, but Audrey Hepburn was ultimately cast, bringing her own interpretation to the character. While the film diverged from Capote’s vision in some respects, it remains a testament to the power of his original work. The novella’s influence extends beyond the screen, inspiring countless adaptations, references, and discussions about Holly Golightly’s legacy.

In summary, while George Axelrod wrote the script for the 1961 film *Breakfast at Tiffany’s*, the story’s origins lie in Truman Capote’s 1958 novella. Capote’s masterful portrayal of Holly Golightly and her world provided the blueprint for Axelrod’s adaptation, ensuring that both the novella and the film continue to captivate audiences. Understanding the distinction between the original author and the screenwriter highlights the collaborative nature of bringing a literary work to the screen and underscores Capote’s enduring impact on literature and popular culture.

anmeal

Screenplay Adaptation: George Axelrod adapted Capote's novella into the 1961 film script

The screenplay for the iconic 1961 film *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* was adapted by George Axelrod, based on Truman Capote’s 1958 novella of the same name. Axelrod, a seasoned playwright and screenwriter known for his wit and sophistication, was tasked with translating Capote’s nuanced narrative into a cinematic experience. While Capote’s novella is a poignant exploration of loneliness and identity, Axelrod’s adaptation introduced changes to align the story with Hollywood conventions of the time, particularly in terms of tone and character development. This adaptation process required a delicate balance between preserving the essence of Capote’s work and crafting a script that would resonate with a broader audience.

One of the most significant challenges Axelrod faced was transforming the character of Holly Golightly. In Capote’s novella, Holly is a complex, often unsympathetic figure, whose ambiguity and flaws are central to her character. Axelrod, however, softened her edges for the screen, making her more likable and relatable. This shift was partly influenced by the casting of Audrey Hepburn, whose innate charm and elegance demanded a more optimistic portrayal. Axelrod’s script also introduced a clearer romantic arc between Holly and Paul Varjak (played by George Peppard), which was less pronounced in Capote’s original work. This change was strategic, as it provided a more conventional narrative structure for audiences accustomed to Hollywood romances.

Axelrod’s adaptation also streamlined the novella’s plot, focusing primarily on Holly’s relationship with Paul while downplaying other elements of Capote’s story. For instance, the character of "2E," Holly’s gay neighbor in the novella, was transformed into the flamboyant José da Silva Pereira, played by José Luis de Vilallonga. This change reflected the era’s sensibilities regarding LGBTQ+ representation on screen. Additionally, Axelrod omitted Capote’s darker themes, such as Holly’s troubled past and her ambiguous moral choices, to maintain a lighter, more palatable tone for mainstream audiences.

Despite these alterations, Axelrod’s script retained much of Capote’s distinctive voice, particularly in its dialogue. The witty banter and sharp observations that define Holly’s character are a testament to Axelrod’s skill in capturing Capote’s style. The iconic opening scene, where Holly stands outside Tiffany’s eating a pastry and gazing into the store window, is a direct nod to Capote’s imagery, though Axelrod expanded it to set the film’s whimsical tone. This blend of fidelity and innovation is what makes Axelrod’s adaptation both a tribute to Capote’s work and a standalone masterpiece in its own right.

In conclusion, George Axelrod’s adaptation of *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* is a masterful example of screenplay writing that navigates the challenges of translating literature to film. While he made significant changes to suit the medium and audience expectations, Axelrod preserved the spirit of Capote’s novella, particularly in its exploration of identity and longing. His script not only cemented the film’s place in cinematic history but also ensured that Holly Golightly remains one of the most enduring characters in American cinema. Axelrod’s work is a testament to the art of adaptation, demonstrating how a skilled writer can honor the source material while creating something uniquely compelling for the screen.

Morning Coffee: Why You Should Wait

You may want to see also

anmeal

Capote's Involvement: Capote had limited input in the screenplay, despite being the source material

Truman Capote, the author of the novella *Breakfast at Tiffany’s*, had surprisingly limited involvement in the screenplay adaptation of his work. Despite being the source material, Capote’s direct input into the script was minimal. The task of adapting his novella for the screen fell primarily to screenwriter George Axelrod, who was hired by Paramount Pictures to craft the screenplay. Capote’s role was largely confined to being a consultant rather than an active collaborator, a fact that later became a point of contention for him.

Capote’s novella, published in 1958, was a slender yet poignant work that explored the life of Holly Golightly, a free-spirited socialite in New York City. While the novella’s tone was gritty and introspective, the film adaptation took a significantly different approach, softening Holly’s character and altering key plot elements to suit the Hollywood romantic comedy formula. Capote was reportedly dissatisfied with these changes, particularly the sanitization of Holly’s character and the addition of a happy ending, which diverged sharply from the ambiguity of his original story.

Despite his reservations, Capote’s involvement in the screenplay was largely peripheral. He did not write the script himself nor did he have creative control over its direction. Axelrod, known for his work on *The Seven Year Itch*, took liberties with the source material, focusing on making the story more commercially viable. Capote’s input was limited to occasional consultations, and even then, his suggestions were often overlooked in favor of the studio’s vision. This lack of direct involvement left Capote feeling disconnected from the final product.

Capote’s limited role in the screenplay was further compounded by the studio’s decision to prioritize Audrey Hepburn’s star power and the film’s marketability. Hepburn’s portrayal of Holly Golightly became iconic, but it was a far cry from Capote’s original conception of the character, who was inspired by his friend, socialite Gloria Vanderbilt. Capote had reportedly wanted Marilyn Monroe to play Holly, a choice that aligned more closely with the novella’s darker undertones. However, the studio’s decision to cast Hepburn and reshape the narrative to suit her image further marginalized Capote’s influence.

In the end, while *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* remains a beloved classic in cinema, Capote’s involvement in its screenplay was minimal. His novella provided the foundation, but the film’s script was largely the work of George Axelrod and the studio executives who steered it toward a more conventional Hollywood narrative. Capote’s limited input serves as a reminder of the often complex relationship between authors and the adaptations of their work, where creative control can be elusive even when the source material is deeply personal.

anmeal

Changes from Novella: Axelrod altered Holly Golightly's character and the ending for the film

George Axelrod, the screenwriter behind the iconic film *Breakfast at Tiffany’s*, made significant changes to Truman Capote’s original novella, particularly in the characterization of Holly Golightly and the film’s ending. In the novella, Holly is a more complex and ambiguous figure, portrayed as a deeply flawed and often unlikable character. Capote’s Holly is a café society girl who drifts through life, relying on wealthy men for financial support while maintaining a detached and cynical outlook. Axelrod, however, softened her edges for the screen, transforming her into a more sympathetic and romanticized figure. Audrey Hepburn’s portrayal, influenced by Axelrod’s script, emphasized Holly’s charm, vulnerability, and dreams, making her more accessible to audiences. This shift in character portrayal was partly driven by the studio’s desire to create a more marketable and likable protagonist.

One of the most notable changes Axelrod made was Holly’s background and motivations. In the novella, her past is darker and more ambiguous, with hints of a troubled childhood and a history of survival through questionable means. Axelrod sanitized this aspect, inventing a backstory where Holly, originally named Lula Mae Barnes, escapes her impoverished Southern roots to reinvent herself in New York. This change gave her character a clearer arc of self-discovery and redemption, aligning with the film’s more optimistic tone. Additionally, Axelrod downplayed Holly’s relationships with men, particularly her involvement with mobster Sally Tomato, to focus more on her romantic connection with the narrator, renamed Paul Varjak in the film.

Axelrod also altered Holly’s relationships and her interactions with other characters. In the novella, her bond with the narrator is more transactional and less romantic, whereas the film emphasizes a deep emotional connection between Holly and Paul. This shift allowed for a more traditional love story, which was more palatable for 1960s audiences. Axelrod further minimized the presence of Rusty Trawler, a character from the novella who represents Holly’s potential future as a kept woman, to avoid complicating her character’s journey toward independence and love.

The ending of *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* underwent perhaps the most significant transformation under Axelrod’s pen. In Capote’s novella, the conclusion is open-ended and bittersweet: Holly disappears abruptly, leaving the narrator uncertain about her fate. This ending reflects the transient and uncertain nature of her life. Axelrod, however, crafted a more conventional Hollywood ending where Holly and Paul reunite in the rain, symbolizing their commitment to each other and Holly’s decision to settle down. This resolution provided a sense of closure and optimism that contrasted sharply with the novella’s ambiguity.

Axelrod’s changes to Holly’s character and the film’s ending were not without controversy. Critics and fans of Capote’s work often argue that the film’s portrayal of Holly loses the depth and complexity of the original character. However, Axelrod’s adaptations were instrumental in making *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* a cultural phenomenon, ensuring its enduring appeal. By softening Holly’s edges and providing a more hopeful conclusion, Axelrod created a version of the story that resonated with a broader audience, even as it diverged from Capote’s vision.

anmeal

Axelrod's Career: Known for The Seven Year Itch, Axelrod brought wit and charm to the script

George Axelrod, a master of wit and comedic timing, left an indelible mark on Hollywood with his sharp dialogue and keen understanding of human nature. While he is perhaps best known for his work on *The Seven Year Itch*, a play that later became a iconic film starring Marilyn Monroe, Axelrod’s career spanned a range of projects that showcased his ability to blend humor with insight. His adaptation of *The Seven Year Itch* for the stage in 1952 and subsequent involvement in its 1955 film version established him as a writer who could craft relatable, entertaining stories with a distinctive voice. This success laid the foundation for his later work, including his contribution to *Breakfast at Tiffany’s*, where his signature wit and charm were once again on full display.

Axelrod’s involvement in *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* came at a pivotal moment in his career. Tasked with adapting Truman Capote’s novella for the screen, Axelrod brought his expertise in character-driven comedy to the project. While the film diverged significantly from Capote’s original story, Axelrod’s script retained the essence of Holly Golightly’s free-spirited nature while infusing it with the kind of clever dialogue and comedic situations he was known for. His ability to balance the character’s complexities with moments of levity ensured that the film resonated with audiences, cementing his reputation as a writer who could elevate material with his unique touch.

The success of *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* further solidified Axelrod’s standing in the industry as a writer who could bring both depth and humor to his scripts. His work on *The Seven Year Itch* had already demonstrated his talent for creating relatable, humorous scenarios, and *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* allowed him to apply those skills to a more nuanced narrative. Axelrod’s knack for crafting witty banter and memorable one-liners was particularly evident in the interactions between Audrey Hepburn’s Holly and George Peppard’s Paul, showcasing his ability to make characters both charming and believable.

Beyond these two landmark projects, Axelrod’s career was marked by a consistent ability to inject intelligence and humor into his work. He collaborated with directors like Billy Wilder and contributed to films such as *How to Murder Your Wife* and *The Secret War of Harry Frigg*, further demonstrating his versatility as a screenwriter. However, it is his work on *The Seven Year Itch* and *Breakfast at Tiffany’s* that remains most celebrated, as these films highlight his unique talent for blending comedy with character-driven storytelling.

In retrospect, George Axelrod’s career is a testament to the power of wit and charm in screenwriting. His ability to craft engaging, humorous dialogue while exploring the complexities of human relationships set him apart in an industry often driven by formulaic storytelling. From *The Seven Year Itch* to *Breakfast at Tiffany’s*, Axelrod’s scripts continue to entertain and inspire, proving that a well-written line can leave a lasting impression long after the credits roll. His legacy as a writer who brought intelligence and humor to the screen remains a benchmark for aspiring screenwriters.

Frequently asked questions

The screenplay for *Breakfast at Tiffany's* was written by George Axelrod, based on the novella by Truman Capote.

No, Truman Capote wrote the original novella, but the screenplay was adapted by George Axelrod.

George Axelrod adapted the screenplay for the 1961 film *Breakfast at Tiffany's* from Truman Capote's novella.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment